Home » Topics » Wealth Index » Comparative Wealth Index
Re: Comparative Wealth Index [message #8921 is a reply to message #8910] |
Thu, 14 January 2016 15:47 |
Liz-DHS
Messages: 1516 Registered: February 2013
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Dear User,
A response from Dr. Shea Rutstein,
Quote:Since the DHS Wealth Index has a mean of zero by construction, applying the constant would give a mean of -0.932 for the CWI, not zero! The beta term just expands or reduces the dispersion (equally) so it doesn't change the mean. Has the user reversed the coefficients? Has s/he applied weights (should not for evaluating the mean)? Subset the data?
[Updated on: Mon, 25 January 2016 13:35] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Comparative Wealth Index
By: nael on Thu, 07 January 2016 05:16
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
By: Liz-DHS on Thu, 07 January 2016 10:18
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
By: nael on Thu, 07 January 2016 12:17
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
By: nael on Sat, 09 January 2016 10:27
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
By: Liz-DHS on Tue, 12 January 2016 01:56
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
By: nael on Wed, 13 January 2016 00:14
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
By: nael on Wed, 13 January 2016 00:15
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
By: Liz-DHS on Thu, 14 January 2016 15:47
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
By: nael on Wed, 03 February 2016 21:35
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
By: Liz-DHS on Tue, 16 February 2016 12:01
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
By: lynamg on Tue, 12 May 2020 12:08
|
|
|
Re: Comparative Wealth Index
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Sat Nov 9 17:03:14 Coordinated Universal Time 2024
|