The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Data » Weighting data » Interpretation of Rescaled household level weights for India-NFHS4 (rescaling household level weights for multinomial logit regression and interpretation)
Interpretation of Rescaled household level weights for India-NFHS4 [message #18651] Mon, 20 January 2020 11:28 Go to previous message
preshit is currently offline  preshit
Messages: 13
Registered: March 2018
Location: Tucson, AZ, USA
Member
Hello DHS Forum Members,
My apologies in advance for lengthy post but I want to explain the issue in detail so it will be useful to others as well. For my analysis, I am using the NFHS-4 PR file and multinomial logit regression. I am stratifying my analysis on rural and urban samples and using svy command for population-level inference. I have rescaled my weight variable and my Stata code looks like below:

gen newhv005= hv005/1000000

svyset,clear
svyset [pw=newhv005],psu(hv021)strata(hv023) singleunit(centered)

svy, subpop(if respondent_residence==0) : mlogit Y X1##(i.X2 i.X3) i.X4 i.X5 i.State Fixed Effect // for rural sample
mlogit,rrr

svy, subpop(if respondent_residence==1) : mlogit Y X1##(i.X2 i.X3) i.X4 i.X5 i.State Fixed Effect // for urban sample
mlogit,rrr

svy : mlogit Y X1##(i.X2 i.X3) i.X4 i.X5 i.respondent_residence i.State Fixed Effect // for entire sample
mlogit,rrr


I have tested my code with and without svy setting my data. Without svyset all mlogit regressions give me coefficients, SEs, CIs, and associated P-values. However, when I svyset my data, for urban sample, I am getting the following error:
Warning: variance matrix is nonsymmetric or highly singular

And the output is missing SEs, CIs, and associated P-values.

I searched the Stata user forum and realized this error is because one of my Strata has only one PSU which can be checked with the command:

svydes if respondent_residence==1 //to check if there is only one PSU within any strata


I approached Stata Technical Support and received the following reply:

I have checked your data, the pweight you are using, newhv005, has a
relatively big variation. The minimum value is .000673 and the maximum
is 38.9548. If the computation has perfect precision, there will not be
a problem. However, all the computation on computers have limited
precision, and -mlogit- is particularly sensitive to variation in
pweight. The missing value you saw is a numerical problem because of
limited precision. You should check your data to see why the pweight has
such a big variation.

If you still want to use the same pweight variable, you can avoid this
numerical problem by rescaling your pweight. Instead of dividing hv005
by 1000000, you can divide it by 100000000 or larger number. This will
solve the problem of missing SE. Please note that rescaling the pweight
does not affect the point estimates or standard errors of the
coefficients. It only affects the population size reported. In this
case, you should use a different unit to interpret the population size
reported, e.g., instead of using one person, you should use a group of
100 persons as the unit.

*********

Given this reply I have the following questions:
1. How the interpretation of -mlogit- will change if I rescale pweight to 10000000 and not to the recommended 1million?
2. Or shall I rescale the pweight in some other way?
3. Is there any other way I should specify my model?

Thank you in advance for your time and for reading the post.

Regards
Preshit
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Using weights in regression analysis
Next Topic: Weighting and Multilevel Logistic Regression
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue May 21 13:27:41 Coordinated Universal Time 2024