| Improvement of DHS data on migration [message #17047] |
Fri, 15 March 2019 08:40  |
machiyama
Messages: 6
Registered: April 2013
Location: UK
|
Member |
|
|
The proposed additions to the household schedule would bring DHS into line with census data and represent a major new dimension in the utility of, and audience for, DHS data.
John Cleland, on behalf of the IUSSP Panel on Family Planning, Fertility and Urban Development
John.Cleland@lshtm.ac.uk
|
|
|
|
| Re: Improvement of DHS data on migration [message #17113 is a reply to message #17047] |
Fri, 15 March 2019 13:49  |
danzhalim
Messages: 11
Registered: March 2019
|
Member |
|
|
This comment is made on behalf of the Gender Group at The World Bank.
In addition to the suggested district of residence 5 years ago, consider questioning HHM's birth district to infer migration and potential risk-sharing mechanism of extended families including marriages arranged out of the home location.
In areas with Fragility, Conflict, and Violence (FCV)/ other contexts of forced displacement, consider asking why HHM/family moved from the last place of residence (displaced or voluntary). If displaced, was it due to: climate, natural disaster, security/forced displacement. And how many times they have moved in the last X years, and why?
We would love to continue the discussion and work alongside DHS to develop a more refined instrument in measuring the indicated indicators. Please do not hesitate to email Kathleen Beegle (kbeegle@worldbank.org) and Daniel Halim (dhalim@worldbank.org).
Daniel Halim
Gender Group
The World Bank
[Updated on: Fri, 15 March 2019 22:28] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
The DHS Program User Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
