Merging DHS data sets with municipality information [message #14330] |
Fri, 23 March 2018 05:15  |
clotilde.mahe
Messages: 3 Registered: March 2018
|
Member |
|
|
Dear all,
I would like to merge municipality information for a different source with the different DHS data sets (for 1995, 2000, 2005 and 2010 DHS waves for Colombia). However, I am having difficulties understanding which variable(s) give the municipality number in the DHS data sets. 'smunip' is a code from 1 to 61, specific to the DHS for surveyed municipalities that cannot be used with the official (DANE) used to code municipalities... The variable giving information on the primary sampling area (a municipality according to the report of 1995) ('smuest', if I am not mistaken) contains much more unique observations than the sampled number of municipalities (61)... Is there a way to obtain the DANE code of municipalities in the DHS data sets so that I could merge information on municipalities from another source?
Thank you for your consideration and help.
Clotilde
[Updated on: Fri, 23 March 2018 05:15] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Merging DHS data sets with municipality information [message #24070 is a reply to message #24062] |
Thu, 17 February 2022 09:59  |
Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 2552 Registered: February 2013
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Following is another response from DHS Chief of Data Processing, Guillermo Rojas:
The instructions I gave before work correctly for all DHS rounds in Colombia (including DHS 2000). The only one that has a different coding schema is 1995 and unfortunately I couldn't find the municipality codes for that round. At that time there were limitations on how many codes (categories) could be stored in dictionaries for variables.
|
|
|