The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Topics » Nutrition and Anthropometry » Age in months or years?
Age in months or years? [message #2865] Wed, 03 September 2014 21:20 Go to next message
pankhurim is currently offline  pankhurim
Messages: 2
Registered: September 2014
Member
I am working on determinants of stunting and wasting among children less than 5 years old... I am wondering whether I should use the Child's age (variable B8) or child's age in months from the household data (HW1). I am using Children's recode file. Help would be appreciated! Thanks!

Pankhuri Mishra

[Updated on: Wed, 03 September 2014 21:20]

Report message to a moderator

Re: Age in months or years? [message #2887 is a reply to message #2865] Sat, 06 September 2014 16:59 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Trevor-DHS is currently offline  Trevor-DHS
Messages: 789
Registered: January 2013
Senior Member
The two variables contain essentially the same information, one is age in months (HW1) and the other is age in years (B8) - try crosstabulating them and you will see that. You can use whichever is more useful for your analysis.
Re: Age in months or years? [message #2888 is a reply to message #2865] Sat, 06 September 2014 17:30 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Reduced-For(u)m
Messages: 292
Registered: March 2013
Senior Member

This is a statistical point that may or may not be relevant to your work, but which I think is important to keep in mind when doing these "determinants of stunting" type regressions.

If you collapse HAZ/WAZ by age you will see a very strong age profile, where in most countries children start out with z-scores around 0 to -1, and then those z-scores fall off very quickly over the first few years of life. So most children are not stunted at birth or 6 months old, but the median child may be stunted by age 2 or 3, depending on the country.

I mention this just because it makes interpreting regressions coefficients of the "determinants of stunting" a bit difficult when looking at all children aged 0-5. Including a linear trend in age (which will have a significant and negative estimated coefficient) doesn't totally help with this interpretive problem (and does not fully "control" for the highly non-linear HAZ/WAZ-age profile). If you really wanted to completely control for the age effect (say because you are interested in the effects of some other covariates that may in some way be correlated with child age - like parental age or seasonality or any covariates that, within a household, change over time systematically) you would probably want to include either dummy variables for age in months or some very flexible polynomial in age.

Whatever specification for age you put in your regression, you will get a more refined control by using age in months instead of age in rounded years (or course, age in years with decimal places will give you the same result).
Re: Age in months or years? [message #2891 is a reply to message #2888] Sun, 07 September 2014 13:40 Go to previous message
pankhurim is currently offline  pankhurim
Messages: 2
Registered: September 2014
Member
Thank you, that helps!

Pankhuri Mishra
Previous Topic: District variables in NFHS 1 and 2 rounds
Next Topic: Dataset to use for analysis of determinants of childhood stunting
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Apr 22 02:03:01 Coordinated Universal Time 2024