| 
		
			| Labeling mistakes in exposure to mass media variables in Zambia 2007 stata dataset [message #2663] | Sun, 03 August 2014 12:00  |  
			| 
				
				
					|  ykang12 Messages: 8
 Registered: July 2014
 Location: USA
 | Member |  |  |  
	| I am Yunhee, graduate student of Johns Hopkins School of Public Health. I have been doing data analysis with Zambia 2007 DHS dataset (stata format) and I wanted to know exposure to mass media among adolescent groups by tabulating such variables (v157,v158, v159). But I found labeling mistakes below and questions/answers seemed to be inconsistent with questions in DHS questionnaires. Could you help me clear about this?
 
 < STATA dataset>
 . tab v157
 
 frequency of reading |
 newspaper or magazine |      Freq.     Percent        Cum.
 ------------------------+-----------------------------------
 no education, preschool |        883       55.60       55.60
 primary |        233       14.67       70.28
 secondary |        261       16.44       86.71
 higher |        209       13.16       99.87
 9 |          2        0.13      100.00
 ------------------------+-----------------------------------
 Total |      1,588      100.00
 
 : their answers were recorded as 0,1,2,3,9, which is not consistent with Zambia questionnaire itself and even compared with other countries' dataset.
 < DHS questionnaires>
 Do you read a newspaper or magazine almost every day, at least once a week, less than once a week or not at all?
 ALMOST EVERY DAY . . . . . . . . . . .1
 AT LEAST ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . .2
 LESS THAN ONCE A WEEK . . . . . . . . 3
 NOT AT ALL . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4
 
 
 |  
	|  |  | 
	|  | 
	| 
		
			| Re: Labeling mistakes in exposure to mass media variables in Zambia 2007 stata dataset [message #12649 is a reply to message #2668] | Wed, 28 June 2017 09:57   |  
			| 
				
				
					|  dab000@mail.harvard.edu Messages: 2
 Registered: July 2016
 | Member |  |  |  
	| Hello Bridgette, 
 I am having similar problems to what is described above for V157-V159 of the Kenya DHS for 2003 and 2008 - the response options in the dataset range from 0 to 3, rather than the options in the questionnaires, which range from 1 to 4 in the surveys, and tabulations of these responses do not cleanly map onto published results.  For example, the final report   for the Kenya DHS 2003 survey says that 22.5% of women read the newspaper at least once a week, 28.8% watch television at least once a week, and 75.1% listen to the radio once a week.  However, this does not match the results I have calculated below.
 
 I am not having problems reproducing other results, and I am also not having a problem reproducing these statistics in KDHS 2014 (although there is still a discrepancy in the response options in the dataset vs. the response options in the questionnaire.
 
 Any advice or insights into this issue?
 
    |  
	|  |  | 
	|  |