The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Countries » India » Doubts regarding water related variables NFHS-4
Doubts regarding water related variables NFHS-4 [message #29309] Mon, 27 May 2024 17:41 Go to next message
Varsha is currently offline  Varsha
Messages: 39
Registered: November 2020
Member
Hello,

I want classify households into two groups based on whether the source of drinking water is on premises or not. The variables hv201 and hv235 seem to be quite contradictory. For instance, when hv201 is public tap/standpipe, it can't be located in one's dwelling/yard/plot. Please help we with this.

Thank you.

Re: Doubts regarding water related variables NFHS-4 [message #29310 is a reply to message #29309] Tue, 28 May 2024 10:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bridgette-DHS is currently offline  Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3190
Registered: February 2013
Senior Member

Following is a response from Senior DHS staff member, Tom Pullum:

I opened the HR file (IAHR74FL.dta) in Stata and entered "tab hv201 hv235, m". I think the discrepancies can be explained by a distinction between water for general purposes, with hv235, and water specifically for drinking, with hv201. Otherwise, many combinations, in addition to what you mentioned, would make no sense.

I see that hv235 is NA if hv201 is "piped into dwelling" or "piped to yard/plot". Some recoding of hv235 is called for if you want it to include those cases.
Re: Doubts regarding water related variables NFHS-4 [message #29311 is a reply to message #29310] Tue, 28 May 2024 14:17 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Varsha is currently offline  Varsha
Messages: 39
Registered: November 2020
Member
Thank you for the clarification, Tom.
Re: Doubts regarding water related variables NFHS-4 [message #29329 is a reply to message #29311] Thu, 30 May 2024 12:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bridgette-DHS is currently offline  Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3190
Registered: February 2013
Senior Member
Please see the following response from Senior DHS Staff Member Blake Zachary:

We standardly ask where the drinking water source (hv235) is located (hv201) for public tap/standpipe and it can be located in the dwelling/yard. The only water sources not asked about location are piped into dwelling/yard/plot and in NFHS-4, rainwater.

A separate question on water source for cooking and handwashing (hv202) is standardly asked for those that use bottled water for drinking but the location of that source is not asked. However, NFHS-4 did not include the question on water for handwashing/cooking.

NFHS-4 QRE
/index.php?t=getfile&id=2316&private=0

DHS-8 Standard QRE
/index.php?t=getfile&id=2317&private=0
Re: Doubts regarding water related variables NFHS-4 [message #29330 is a reply to message #29309] Thu, 30 May 2024 22:34 Go to previous messageGo to next message
kneesplatter is currently offline  kneesplatter
Messages: 1
Registered: May 2024
Location: United States
Member
I understand your dilemma regarding the classification of households based on the source of drinking water being on premises or not, especially when dealing with potentially contradictory data from variables hv201 and hv235. Let's break down the issue and work towards a solution.
Step-by-Step Solution:
1. Understanding Variables:
- hv201: This variable typically indicates the main source of drinking water. Examples might include:
+) 11: Piped water into dwelling
+) 12: Piped water to yard/plot
+) 13: Public tap/standpipe
+) etc.
- hv235: This variable indicates whether the water source is on premises or not. Common codes could be:
+) 1: Yes (on premises)
+) 0: No (not on premises)
2. Identifying Contradictions: As you pointed out, a source like "Public tap/standpipe" (hv201 = 13) is unlikely to be located on the premises (hv235 = 1). We need to identify and address such contradictions.
3. Data Cleaning and Classification: To classify the households accurately, we need to create a logic that cross-references hv201 and hv235 and resolves contradictions.
Pseudo-code / Algorithm:
1. Load Data: Load your dataset into your preferred data analysis tool (e.g., Python, R, Excel).
2. Create a New Classification Variable: Create a new variable (e.g., water_on_premises) to classify households based on the drinking water source being on premises or not.
3. Apply Logic to Classify:
- If hv201 indicates a water source that is inherently on premises (e.g., hv201 = 11 or 12), classify as on premises.
- If hv201 indicates a public or communal source (e.g., hv201 = 13), classify as not on premises.
- Otherwise, use hv235 to determine the classification.
Example in Python: image
Explanation:
1.Loading Data: The dataset is loaded using pandas.
2. Defining Classification Logic: A function classify_water_source is defined to classify the water source based on hv201 and hv235.
3. Applying Classification: The function is applied to each row of the dataset to create a new column water_on_premises that holds the classification result.
Addressing Contradictions:
If you find that there are still contradictions (e.g., hv201 = 13 and hv235 = 1), you might need to review those specific records manually or set rules to handle these exceptions based on the context of your study.
Final Step:
After classification, you can analyze the newly created water_on_premises variable to group households and derive insights.
Feel free to adjust the logic based on the specific codes and context of your dataset. If you have further questions or need more detailed assistance, let me know!
Best regards,
kneesplatter
  • Attachment: f.PNG
    (Size: 23.10KB, Downloaded 53 times)


Re: Doubts regarding water related variables NFHS-4 [message #29334 is a reply to message #29329] Fri, 31 May 2024 05:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Varsha is currently offline  Varsha
Messages: 39
Registered: November 2020
Member
Thank you, Blake.
Re: Doubts regarding water related variables NFHS-4 [message #29335 is a reply to message #29330] Fri, 31 May 2024 05:53 Go to previous message
Varsha is currently offline  Varsha
Messages: 39
Registered: November 2020
Member
Thank you, Kneesplatter.
Previous Topic: education in single years at IR vs PR
Next Topic: NFHS-1 Weight for Age Missing for 4 States in HW File
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Nov 11 08:33:23 Coordinated Universal Time 2024