Mothers Education on children's health [message #21720] |
Sat, 12 December 2020 13:37 |
kisangoli57
Messages: 1 Registered: December 2020
|
Member |
|
|
Hi
I'm running a linear regression analysis to calculate the impact of mothers'education on children malnutrition in Zambia. I choose to use the KR recode file for the analysis because it has all the data I need about parents education and children health. I have a lot of independent variables and I choose Child Height for Age SD (New WHO, HW70) as the dependent variable. I recoded some of the variables so that 0 would have been the case with lack of something (no education, no toilet facility, bad type of cooking fuel...) and 1 to better situations. However the R^2 and the adjusted one are very little significative. May be the way I recoded the variable? I also tried to recode in several other ways such us giving value between 1 and 5 to all the modalities of the variables, but still the results are not even sufficient to demonstrate something.
I know this is a general statistical problem but I hope someone could help me.
Thank you very much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Mothers Education on children's health [message #22725 is a reply to message #22715] |
Tue, 27 April 2021 14:31 |
Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3167 Registered: February 2013
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Following is a response from DHS Research & Data Analysis Director, Tom Pullum:
The main difference between the children in the PR file and the children in the KR file is that the PR file includes children whose mother is not in the household. So if you want to use data from the mother, such as mother's education, then you need to use the KR file. If you only need household data, such as sanitation, then the PR file will be sufficient.
|
|
|