The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Topics » Mortality » Weighting Total Pregnancies Data - Stillbirth value is reducing (Association between unintended pregnancies (unwanted & mistimed), and stillbirth among women aged 15-49 in Zambia )
Weighting Total Pregnancies Data - Stillbirth value is reducing [message #26800] Tue, 02 May 2023 17:22 Go to next message
Shadrick Kayeye is currently offline  Shadrick Kayeye
Messages: 13
Registered: February 2023
Member
Hi,

Kindly help! I have managed to calculate the number of stillbirth for Zambia in line with the ZDHS 2018 report using SPSS. The challenge however is that once I compute the the sample size which is the total # women who have had pregnancies of 7 months (births + stillbirths) or more and weight it (which matches with the ZDHS report= 9869 from about 13500), this automatically affects the number of stillbirths and increases them to 200 from the accurate 119.I am failing to figure out where I am going wrong. Kindly guide, I have attached the outputs and syntax commands for reference. Your prompt feedback will be greatly appreciated.

Regards
Shadrick
Re: Weighting Total Pregnancies Data - Stillbirth value is reducing [message #26832 is a reply to message #26800] Fri, 05 May 2023 14:29 Go to previous message
Janet-DHS is currently offline  Janet-DHS
Messages: 698
Registered: April 2022
Senior Member
Following is a response from DHS staff member, Tom Pullum:

As you know, weighted and unweighted subtotals are usually different. But the difference between 119 and 200 is probably too large to be explained that way.

A pregnancy of 7+ months is a B or T preceded by 6 or more months of P. Could it be that you are using a 7 rather than a 6 for the preceding number of Ps? I cannot go through your SPSS code but that's my suspicion.
Previous Topic: Stillbirth calculation- Zambia Using SPSS
Next Topic: Maternal Mortality in Liberia
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Fri Apr 26 05:48:53 Coordinated Universal Time 2024