The DHS Program User Forum: India » Out of Pocket Expenditure for Delivery Care

Home » Countries » India » Out of Pocket Expenditure for Delivery Care

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Out of Pocket Expenditure for Delivery Care [message #26478]

Fri, 24 March 2023 05:32

rekha_s
Messages: 2
Registered: March 2023

Member

Can anyone please help with the code for finding OOPE for delivery care using NFHS-5 India?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Out of Pocket Expenditure for Delivery Care [message #26481 is a reply to message #26478]

Fri, 24 March 2023 08:36

Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 2862
Registered: February 2013

Senior Member

Following is a response from Senior DHS staff member, Tom Pullum:

If you are asking about the code for specific tables in the final report, please say which tables.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Out of Pocket Expenditure for Delivery Care [message #26495 is a reply to message #26481]

Sun, 26 March 2023 10:06

rekha_s
Messages: 2
Registered: March 2023

Member

Sorry. I tried to generate delivery costs using NFHS 4 data. I cannot match the report. Can you please help with the same? Table No: 8.20.

The values I am getting are:
Public: 3152
Private: 17126
Total: 7069

Whereas the actual figures in the table are:

Public: 3197
Private: 16522
Total: 7935

Report message to a moderator

Re: Out of Pocket Expenditure for Delivery Care [message #26512 is a reply to message #26495]

Tue, 28 March 2023 09:14

Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 2862
Registered: February 2013

Senior Member

Following is a response from Senior DHS staff member, Tom Pullum:

I am uploading separate Stata programs for table 8.20 in the NFHS-4 and NFHS-5 reports. I believe a version of the program for NFHS-5 was posted earlier. The programs match the n's but do not exactly match the means. The complication with the total expenditure is that sometimes it comes from a stated total and sometimes it has to be calculated from the separate components. There appears to have been a confounding of 0 to mean "no cost" and 0 to mean "not stated" or "don't know". "Don't know" was supposed to be code 99998. The calculation depends on the interpretation of code 0 and code 99998 for the total and the components. I am not confident my interpretation of these codes, but I also am not confident in the original construction, which I do not have. Your approach may be equally good. If anyone out there can match table 8.20 in either report, please let us know.

Attachment: NFHS4_table_8pt20_do_KR_27Mar2023.txt
(Size: 5.95KB, Downloaded 35 times)
Attachment: NFHS5_table_8pt20_do_KR_27Mar2023.txt
(Size: 5.91KB, Downloaded 43 times)

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Norms variables [[URGENT]]
Next Topic:	Women's occupation variable NFHS 5

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Tue Sep 26 06:19:45 Coordinated Universal Time 2023