Community level Poverty [message #23174] |
Tue, 27 July 2021 04:36 |
saifulhaq
Messages: 7 Registered: October 2019
|
Member |
|
|
Dear expoerts,
Please give your feedback on the following coding which i have used for constructing "community level poverty" using dhs data of Pakistan. i need to know if this variable has been constructed correctly.
gen cpvt=0
replace cpvt=1 if v190==1
bysor v001:egen cmpov=mean(cpvt)
xtile compov=cmpov,nq(3)
la def compov 1 low 2 moderate 3 high
la var compov "Community Poverty Level"
la val compov compov
tab compov[iweight=wgt]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Community level Poverty [message #23187 is a reply to message #23184] |
Wed, 28 July 2021 08:10 |
Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3190 Registered: February 2013
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Following is a response from DHS Research & Data Analysis Director, Tom Pullum:
If you just use "cmpov" in the Stata code you sent, rather than "compov", you will have the proportion of women in the cluster who are in wealth quintile 1. You could treat that as a continuous measure.
As a slight modification, you could replace "if v190==1" with "if v190==1 | v190==2". This would give the proportion of women who are in wealth quintiles 1 and 2, and I think will be in a better range.
If you multiply by 100, you will have a percentage rather than a proportion.
|
|
|