Home » Topics » Domestic Violence » Multilevel Weights
Multilevel Weights [message #7019] |
Tue, 11 August 2015 13:16 |
swinter
Messages: 2 Registered: August 2015
|
Member |
|
|
Greetings DHS experts!
I recently posted a question on the forum about the domestic violence weights that is somewhat related to this post, but is focused on different questions:
( http://userforum.dhsprogram.com/index.php?t=tree&th=4410 &goto=6918&S=85ccc984d9dd623f59e3088f0d1e73c9#msg_69 18)
This post is meant to focus on the multilevel nature of the DHS weights (or, seemingly, the lack thereof). I am conducting a number of two and three-level multilevel modelling using both individual-level country data (two-level models) and multi-country data (three-level models). I have been doing the modeling largely in Stata 14 (using melogit) and MLwin 2.34 (using PQL and MCMC). Unfortunately, both of these softwares provide very specific instructions in their manuals to use multilevel sampling weights instead of a single-level weight when conducting multilevel analyses (except MCMC in MLwin or crossed mixed effects models, which don't allow weights). For an example of these instructions, see following passage from Stata 14 manual:
"it is not sufficient to use the single sampling weight wij , because weights enter the log likelihood at both the group level and the individual level. Instead, what is required for a two-level model under this sampling design is wj , the inverse of the probability that group j is selected in the first stage, and wi|j, the inverse of the probability that individual i from group j is selected at the second stage conditional on group j already being selected. You cannot use wij without making any assumptions about wj. Given the rules of conditional probability, wij = wjwi|j. If your dataset has only wij , then you will need to either assume equal probability sampling at the first stage (wj = 1 for all j) or find some way to recover wj from other variables in your data; see Rabe-Hesketh and Skrondal (2006) and the references therein for some suggestions on how to do this, but realize that there is little yet known about how well these approximations perform in practice. What you really need to fit your two-level model are data that contain wj in addition to either wij or wi|j. If you have wij--that is, the unconditional inclusion weight for observation i, j--then you need to divide wij by wj to obtain wi|j" (Stata 14 Manual - "meglm -- Multilevel mixed-effects generalized linear model, p.21 available at: http://www.stata.com/manuals14/memeglm.pdf#memeglmMethodsand formulas)
From my reading of the DHS sampling literature, the multilevel nature of the DHS sampling is particularly important in the domestic violence sampling weights because, unlike the other weights (v005 and hv005), individual women sampled for the dv module do not have the same weight as the households. So, it seems to me, that for a two-level model, there should be, at a minimum, a PSU-level (level 2) weight and an individual-level (level 1) dv weight that incorporates the dv sample design and non-response. Does anyone have suggestions about how to tackle the multilevel weighting issue? Should individuals interested in multilevel modeling just assume the sampling probability at the first-stage (e.g. the PSU weight) is equal for all PSUs (e.g. wj=1 for all j)? Or, should we try to "recover" the multilevel weights using the technique cited in Rabe-Hesketh and Skrondal (2006) or another technique? Will DHS provide methodology for extracting the multilevel weights (I did try doing this based on the equations in the DHS sampling manual, but I have more unknowns than equations, particularly in regards to back-calculating the domestic violence weights). Any other thoughts?
Thanks so much!
|
|
|
|
|
Multilevel Weights
By: swinter on Tue, 11 August 2015 13:16
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Liz-DHS on Tue, 18 August 2015 12:28
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Liz-DHS on Wed, 27 January 2016 12:39
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: ttuti on Thu, 16 June 2016 05:35
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Liz-DHS on Wed, 29 June 2016 11:15
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: e_lee on Fri, 23 September 2016 14:16
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Liz-DHS on Mon, 26 September 2016 11:37
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: soumava on Fri, 12 May 2017 16:01
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Liz-DHS on Wed, 28 June 2017 16:55
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: ab803 on Fri, 13 October 2017 11:18
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Liz-DHS on Wed, 08 November 2017 14:52
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Liz-DHS on Wed, 04 April 2018 15:50
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Hassen on Mon, 30 April 2018 14:53
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Liz-DHS on Tue, 01 May 2018 23:28
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Hassen on Wed, 02 May 2018 03:14
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Liz-DHS on Tue, 03 July 2018 23:04
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: teketo on Thu, 04 October 2018 06:35
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: aheto on Sat, 04 April 2020 12:00
|
|
|
Re: Multilevel Weights
By: Liz-DHS on Fri, 17 April 2020 09:17
|
Goto Forum:
Current Time: Mon Nov 25 22:11:48 Coordinated Universal Time 2024
|