The DHS Program User Forum: Weighting data » Using weights for small geographical locations

Home » Data » Weighting data » Using weights for small geographical locations

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Using weights for small geographical locations [message #3379 is a reply to message #3375]

Mon, 01 December 2014 19:59

nobleman00
Messages: 3
Registered: November 2014

Member

Thank you for your response.

I was also concerned that the sample is designed to be representative at the region level, not at the level of smaller units.
Due to this reason, (1) the sub-national boundary level is the primary focus of this analysis. The purpose of (2) the grid cell level analysis is simply to show the raw outputs only for the households included in survey clusters within each grid cell, acknowledging that the results are no longer representative at any level (neither the sub-national boundary level nor the grid cell level).
In this regard, I was considering doing the second level analysis (grid cell) without using sample weights. Would this sound unreasonable?
Thank you for your time in advance.

Jung

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Using weights for small geographical locations By: nobleman00 on Tue, 25 November 2014 20:29
		Re: Using weights for small geographical locations By: Trevor-DHS on Mon, 01 December 2014 10:30
		Re: Using weights for small geographical locations By: nobleman00 on Mon, 01 December 2014 19:59
		Re: Using weights for small geographical locations By: Trevor-DHS on Tue, 02 December 2014 11:07

Previous Topic:	Phase I surveys
Next Topic:	When weights are not supported

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Dec 27 07:06:06 Coordinated Universal Time 2024