The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Data » Weighting data » Response rate and weights (Effect on child health using information available for both parents)
Re: Response rate and weights [message #26633 is a reply to message #26580] Wed, 12 April 2023 04:08 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
shreyaj7 is currently offline  shreyaj7
Messages: 7
Registered: March 2023
Member
Dear Tom & Bridgette,

I am making a table for the prevalence of hypogamous marriages (Women marrying men with lesser education than them) state-wise for India.
The following steps were taken:
1. I used IR women's recode> selected only those women whose husband's background characteristics are available( 1/6th sample N=81487)> created variable hypogamy [Binary variable takes value 1 if wive_edu> Husb_edu; O otherwise]
2. set svy> svyset v021 [pw=wgt], strata(v023) singleunit(centered) ,where wgt= v005/1000000
3. Now I used the syntax to get my proportions> svy: mean hypogamy, over(state) , this gives me the percentage of hypogamous marriages in each state and all India average as(25.98%)
4. I repeated the exercise by using state weights( sweight) and by merging men's weight from men's recode (mv005). I got the same results for sate level percentages by using state weights but different All India average (24.91 %). Similarly using men's weight changes the percentages for states and as well the all India average (27.26%).

Now I want to know if got the steps right and which results to go with I mean which weights to use in this context. Looking forward to reply. Thank you.
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Why I am getting different total observations when using iweight for tabulating a variable
Next Topic: All-women factor in trend analysis
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Nov 25 21:50:47 Coordinated Universal Time 2024