The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Topics » Mortality » Git Hub Coding Versus My Code for Tetanus Vaccine Status
Git Hub Coding Versus My Code for Tetanus Vaccine Status [message #20489] Wed, 11 November 2020 12:15 Go to previous message
shujaat.smc@gmail.com is currently offline  shujaat.smc@gmail.com
Messages: 75
Registered: July 2020
Senior Member
Dear DHS Representative,

For assessing the Tetanus vaccination status of the mother having the most recent birth in the preceding five years before the conduct of the survey (bidx==1) I recode m1 variable as

recode m1 (0 8 . =1 "NotVaccinated") (1=2 "PartiallyVaccinated") (2/7=0 "CompletelyVaccinated"), gen (TetanusVaccination)

Vs

//tetanus toxoid injections (Shared on Github)

recode m1 (0 1 8 9 . =1 "no") (1/7 = 0 "yes"), gen(rh_anc_toxinj)
recode m1 (0 1 8 9 . =1 "No") (1/7 = 0 "Yes"), gen(rh_anc_toxinj)
replace rh_anc_toxinj = . if age>=period
label var rh_anc_toxinj "Received 2+ tetanus injections during last pregnancy"


Quest: Why the person who had shared the command on Github has used 1 as "no" since this 1 means One dose of vaccine received by the women and also 1 is again there in 1/7 that is 1 here is considered to one dose of vaccine received.

Quest: Is my recoding of m1 is right and why the GitHub programmer/coder has specified if age>=period.

Quest: What will happens to my estimates if I donot use "if age>=period" instead i am using "if bidx==1 & b0==0 & v210!=1" .

I am at the stage of stepwise forward cox model building, therefore request you to kindly reply as soon as possible.

Best Regards

Dr.Hussain

 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Preceding sibling survival status
Next Topic: Comparison Between Birth weight Variable m19 & m18
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Mon Dec 23 21:29:14 Coordinated Universal Time 2024