The DHS Program User Forum: Dataset use in Stata

Home » Data » Dataset use in Stata » Household crowding

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Household crowding [message #19854 is a reply to message #19812]

Thu, 20 August 2020 13:53

Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3190
Registered: February 2013

Senior Member

Following is a response from DHS Research & Data Analysis Director, Tom Pullum:

I don't believe the distinction between level 1 and level 2 will be useful. The only leverage you will get on estimating an intra-class correlation between individuals in the same household will come from households in which more than one person has TB. If the number of persons with TB in the same household is always 0 or 1, you have no information. If there are very few exceptions to 0 and 1, the estimate will be very uncertain. The number of persons tested in the household is also relevant

To use municipality, rather than cluster, at level 3 (or 2) requires constant weights and I don't think you have them. Clusters, not municipalities, were the PSUs in the sample design.

We just issued a methodological report related to multilevel models, and I recommend that you look at it: https://www.dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/MR27/MR27.pdf. I hope other users have suggestions.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Household crowding By: j_lewis98 on Mon, 17 August 2020 08:28
		Re: Household crowding By: Bridgette-DHS on Mon, 17 August 2020 10:40
		Re: Household crowding By: j_lewis98 on Mon, 17 August 2020 14:03
		Re: Household crowding By: Bridgette-DHS on Thu, 20 August 2020 13:53

Previous Topic:	10% 2011 census sample (South Africa)
Next Topic:	Guidance regarding Gender Pooling in Liberia 2013 DHS data

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Nov 9 06:18:28 Coordinated Universal Time 2024