| Re: weights for ttest [message #1687 is a reply to message #1685] | 
			Thu, 27 March 2014 16:40    | 
		 
		
			
				
				
				
					
						
						Reduced-For(u)m
						 Messages: 292 Registered: March 2013 
						
					 | 
					Senior Member  | 
					 | 
		 
		 
	 | 
 
	
		 
Thanks for that Liz/Shea.  
 
I've always needed a reason to check the equivalence of these two methods using DHS data, so I did a quick comparison of changes in HAZ over time in Bangladesh as a test case. Let me just confirm that both of these methods generate the same point estimates, and very similar standard errors (probably just rounding differences, and/or something about my specification of strata/psu across survey rounds - but the regression form generated slightly larger se's). 
 
I would add that the regression version took me like 1/10th the time, but that was because retrieving the variance estimates from "svy: mean" took me a minute as they are returned in a matrix. 
 
So point is - Fay: they both work, and statistical theory is vindicated!
		
		
		
 |  
	| 
		
	 | 
 
 
 |