Home » Countries » India » Mismatch between National report and NFHS4 raw data analysis
| Re: Mismatch between National report and NFHS4 raw data analysis [message #16686 is a reply to message #16363] |
Sun, 17 February 2019 10:34   |
Pooja Arora
Messages: 3
Registered: February 2019
|
Member |
|
|
Dear fredarnold,
When I use svyset command with state level weights for doing state level analysis for India, I use the weight variable sv005. In that, does my strata remain the same? That is v022?
Thank you,
Pooja
fredarnold wrote on Wed, 26 December 2018 12:15It looks like you are trying to match the results for Jharkhand. In that case, you need to change the weight from v005 to sv005, which is necessary every time you are analyzing an individual state. As you can see below, the urban percentage for Jharkhand (29.9 percent) comes out exactly the same as the estimate in the Jharkhand state report.
. svy: tab bf1hour if age < 24 & midx == 1 & v102 == 1 & v024 == 15
(running tabulate on estimation sample)
Number of strata = 24 Number of obs = 852
Number of PSUs = 286 Population size = 881.91211
Design df = 262
-----------------------
RECODE of |
m34 (when |
child put |
to |
breast) | proportions
----------+------------
0 | .7011
1 | .2989
|
Total | 1
-----------------------
Key: proportions = cell proportions
[Updated on: Sun, 17 February 2019 10:37] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
Current Time: Mon Nov 25 08:51:49 Coordinated Universal Time 2024
|
The DHS Program User Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
