| Daughter age at circumcision Mali 2006 [message #3257] |
Thu, 13 November 2014 05:31  |
aligazan
Messages: 24
Registered: June 2014
Location: UK
|
Member |
|
|
I am working with the Mali 2006 Dataset.
The variable S915 gives the daughters age at the time of circumcision. This as I understand it from the questionnaire is given in 3 digits, the first being the year, and the second two being the month.
The range of data is from 100 - 995. I understood 100 to mean 1 year and no months and that this means that no girls were circumcised younger than 1 year.
However, in the DHS report for Mali 2006 table 18.6 'Âge des filles à l'excision' the data and range of ages shown does not seem to match to the information within variable S915 in the dataset.
Would you be able to explain to me how the data in table 18.6 is calculated?
Many thanks
Janet
|
|
|
|
| Re: Daughter age at circumcision Mali 2006 [message #3303 is a reply to message #3257] |
Wed, 19 November 2014 14:11  |
Trevor-DHS
Messages: 803
Registered: January 2013
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Variable S915 is a composite variable with the first digit being a unit field and the last two digits being a number field. The easiest way to handle this is to split it into two parts. You can use the following code in Stata to do that:
gen s915u = int(s915/100)
gen s915n = mod(s915,100)
lab var s915u "Age of daughter at circumcision (units)"
lab var s915n "Age of daughter at circumcision (number)"
lab def s915u 1 "Age in years" 2 "In infancy" 3 "Age in months" 9 "Special answers"
lab def s915n 95 "In infancy" 98 "Don't know" 99 "Missing"
lab val s915u s915u
lab val s915n s915n
tab s915n s915u [iw=v005/1000000]
However when I looked at the data more closely and compared to the Mali 2006 report, it is apparent that there are errors in the coding and an error in the tabulation.
First the error in the coding. The unit code 2 (In infancy) in s915u should match up with code 95 (In infancy) in s915n, but there are cases with code 2 on s915u that have values 1-40 in s915n. I believe these should be code 3 on s915u for age in months, not code 2 (In infancy). Also, code 9 (Special answers) on s915u has numeric values 1-18 on s915n. These are probably keyer errors and could be either age in years or months, but I believe are most likely to be age in years (it is possible they are some of each - I don't think we can tell).
Second the error in the tabulation. When I tried to reproduce table 18.6 it was clear that the table just used s915n from above, assuming all ages were age in years, and ignoring that some were age in months.
Below is code that will first allow you to reproduce the table and then a correction for the age in months:
* Create age groups used in table 18.6 in Mali 2006 report
recode s915n (95=0)(0/1=1)(2/4=2)(5/9=3)(10/14=4)(15/94=5)(98/99=9), gen(age_exc)
* Add labels
lab var age_exc "Age of daughter at circumcision"
label def age_exc 0 "In infancy" 1 "0-1" 2 "2-4" 3 "5-9" 4 "10-14" 5 "15+" 9 "Don't know/missing"
label val age_exc age_exc
* Tabulate as in table 18.6 in Mali 2006 report
tab age_exc [iw=v005/1000000]
* Correction for reporting as age in months
replace age_exc = 1 if s915n< 24 & (s915u==2|s915u==3)
replace age_exc = 2 if (s915n>=24 & s915n<48) & (s915u==2|s915u==3)
* Re-tabulate withh correction
tab age_exc [iw=v005/1000000]
[Updated on: Wed, 19 November 2014 14:13] Report message to a moderator |
|
|
|
| Re: Daughter age at circumcision Mali 2006 [message #3600 is a reply to message #3303] |
Thu, 15 January 2015 11:17 |
aligazan
Messages: 24
Registered: June 2014
Location: UK
|
Member |
|
|
Hi Trevor,
Many thanks for this thorough response.
I noticed today that a new version of the Mali dataset has been released with this variable added/corrected which is great - especially as I had not quite yet got on to following your instructions myself.
I am working on it now and will be following your first steps of splitting the unit and number field. As I am using SPSS not Stata I will try to figure out how to do this using your Stata instructions - I may be in touch again if my SPSS syntax skills are not up to the job.
For future reference is there any way of knowing that a variable is a composite variable in the way that you describe? I have noticed that ages are recorded in different ways.
Once again, many thanks for your help.
Janet
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Daughter age at circumcision Mali 2006 [message #3621 is a reply to message #3618] |
Fri, 16 January 2015 13:44 |
aligazan
Messages: 24
Registered: June 2014
Location: UK
|
Member |
|
|
Thanks again, and yes I managed to work out the SPSS syntax from your stata example.
One last question (for the time being) concerns variable G109 in the Mali 2006 women's dataset which is "line number of daughter most recently circumcised".
Please can you tell me which variable this relates to and in which dataset. I think it is BORD$01 etc. but would be grateful if you could confirm, as my analysis depends upon this.
For example CASEID 1 9 2, G109 tells us the line number of daughter most recently circumcised is 4, and BORD$04 tells us this was the first born child to this woman, and then B4$01 tells us this child is female. Is that correct? (If so, then the last born girl is not always the last daughter circumcised which is unexpected).
Many thanks
Janet
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Daughter age at circumcision Mali 2006 [message #3630 is a reply to message #3624] |
Mon, 19 January 2015 22:42 |
aligazan
Messages: 24
Registered: June 2014
Location: UK
|
Member |
|
|
Hello Trevor
I have been looking at variable G109 within this dataset with an interest in whether the last daughter who was circumcised was alive or dead at the time of the survey.
Using the logic: "Look up the BORD$column indicated by G109 to get the column number of the last daughter (=CLLD)" and then look up the B5$column indicated by CLLD - I get 100% of the last daughters to be circumcised as alive. I also get 100% as female (which makes sense and suggests the column logic is working).
This is unexpected as about 10-15% of children are reported as dead in columns B5.
Is there something within the data collection that means all "last daughters circumcised" are by definition alive at the time of the survey? I can't see anything in the wording of the questionnaire which suggests this (Q911).
Excerpts from the SPSS syntax I've used is below (it's very clunky - I'm sure there are more efficient ways of writing this but I haven't figured it out yet!):
DO IF (G109=1).
RECODE BORD$01 (ELSE=Copy) INTO GavCOLNOLAST.
END IF.
VARIABLE LABELS GavCOLNOLAST 'Column no of last circumcised'.
EXECUTE.
DO IF (G109=2).
RECODE BORD$02 (ELSE=Copy) INTO GavCOLNOLAST.
END IF.
VARIABLE LABELS GavCOLNOLAST 'Column no of last circumcised'.
EXECUTE.
etc to 15
DO IF (GAVCOLNOLAST=1).
RECODE B5$01 (ELSE=Copy) INTO Mortalitylast.
END IF.
VARIABLE LABELS Mortalitylast 'Mortality of last circumcised'.
EXECUTE.
DO IF (GAVCOLNOLAST=2).
RECODE B5$02 (ELSE=Copy) INTO Mortalitylast.
END IF.
VARIABLE LABELS Mortalitylast 'Mortality of last circumcised'.
EXECUTE.
etc. to 15
The result is that all Mortalitylast cells are either blank (where G109 is 99 or blank) or 1 (indicating daughter is alive).
Your help would be very much appreciated.
Best wishes,
Janet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Daughter age at circumcision Mali 2006 [message #3766 is a reply to message #3634] |
Fri, 06 February 2015 12:18 |
aligazan
Messages: 24
Registered: June 2014
Location: UK
|
Member |
|
|
Dear Trevor
I have a new challenge that I am struggling with. I am still working with the Mali 5 dataset and using SPSS.
I would like to bring over some of the data from the Womans IR file into the Male MR file. In particular I would like to bring over the variables concerning the circumcision status of each man's wife/wives/partner(s) e.g. G101, G102, G103, G104
I don't know if I need to merge the IR and MR datasets (and can't even imagine what that would end up looking like!) or if I can just somehow copy the relevant data from the IR into the MR using the line number of wife variable MV034$1 etc.
I would be so grateful if you could explain how to do this.
Many thanks
Janet
|
|
|
|
| Re: Daughter age at circumcision Mali 2006 [message #3774 is a reply to message #3257] |
Mon, 09 February 2015 11:18 |
Trevor-DHS
Messages: 803
Registered: January 2013
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Have you tried working with the Couple's Recode (CR) file. In this file the men's and women's recode data has already been merged together.
Alternatively you can use the MATCH command. See this thread for an example of the MATCH FILES command. You would match using something like:
* Open the women's data.
GET FILE='ccIRvvFL.SAV'.
* Match the men's data to the women's data.
MATCH FILES /FILE=*
/table='C:\data\ccMRvvFL.SAV'
/RENAME MV001=V001 MV002=V002 MV003=V034
/BY V001 V002 V034.
|
|
|
|
The DHS Program User Forum
Members
Search
Help
Register
Login
Home
