The DHS Program User Forum: Weighting data » Using weights for small geographical locations

Home » Data » Weighting data » Using weights for small geographical locations

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Using weights for small geographical locations [message #3375 is a reply to message #3353]

Mon, 01 December 2014 10:30

Trevor-DHS
Messages: 805
Registered: January 2013

Senior Member

You can and should still use hv005 as the sample weight, but doing your analysis with smaller geographic units is potentially problematic. The sample is designed to be representative at the region level, but not at the level of smaller units. As you disaggregate the data to smaller units the sample is less and less likely to be representative. The sample is also designed to provide a certain level of accuracy at the region level, and again as you disaggregate to smaller units the accuracy of those estimates gets worse and worse and the confidence intervals around the estimates quickly become very large and unreliable.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Using weights for small geographical locations By: nobleman00 on Tue, 25 November 2014 20:29
		Re: Using weights for small geographical locations By: Trevor-DHS on Mon, 01 December 2014 10:30
		Re: Using weights for small geographical locations By: nobleman00 on Mon, 01 December 2014 19:59
		Re: Using weights for small geographical locations By: Trevor-DHS on Tue, 02 December 2014 11:07

Previous Topic:	Phase I surveys
Next Topic:	When weights are not supported

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Jun 9 10:19:21 Coordinated Universal Time 2025