The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Topics » Child Health » Children nutritional status (questions related to variables selections)
Children nutritional status [message #29748] Tue, 30 July 2024 12:41 Go to next message
Benn88 is currently offline  Benn88
Messages: 4
Registered: November 2023
Member
Hello everyone,

My name is Benn,


As an academic researcher investigating the determinants of stunting, wasting, and underweight among children under five in Haiti, I have a few clarifying questions regarding the analysis. I am utilizing the Haiti Demographic and Health Survey data, specifically the KR file.

1. When analyzing maternal body mass index as a potential determinant, should I also exclude pregnant women and women who gave birth in the preceding 2 months? I am unsure if the BMI values reported in the final DHS report have already been adjusted for these considerations.

2. In the logistic regression modeling, is it appropriate to include both birth order and birth interval as independent variables? When computing birth interval, the common practice is to exclude the first-born children. Would there be any issues with including both of these variables in the same model?

I appreciate your guidance on these methodological aspects to ensure the robustness of my analysis and the validity of the findings. Any clarification you can provide would be greatly helpful as I work on my first academic paper using this dataset.

Thank you very much
Re: Children nutritional status [message #29768 is a reply to message #29748] Wed, 31 July 2024 11:49 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Janet-DHS is currently offline  Janet-DHS
Messages: 891
Registered: April 2022
Senior Member
Following is a response from DHS staff member, Tom Pullum:

You do need to omit BMI for women who are pregnant or gave birth in the past two months. There is nothing in the coding of the woman's BMI that adjust for that. Mother's BMI would be coded NA for mothers who are pregnant or gave birth in the past two months. Details are given in the Guide to DHS Statistics.

You can include both birth order and the preceding birth interval--those variables are not collinear. However, as you say, birth interval is Not Applicable for bord=1, so first births will be dropped.

With these two types of omissions you will lose a substantial fraction of the cases. However, I don't think there is a good way to avoid that. I would not recommend imputing the NA values. In the part of your analysis that does not include mother's BMI and/or preceding birth interval, you will not lose cases.
Re: Children nutritional status [message #29817 is a reply to message #29768] Thu, 08 August 2024 13:28 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Benn88 is currently offline  Benn88
Messages: 4
Registered: November 2023
Member
Thank you very much.
Benn
Re: Children nutritional status [message #29848 is a reply to message #29768] Tue, 13 August 2024 12:48 Go to previous message
Aurawyer is currently offline  Aurawyer
Messages: 1
Registered: August 2024
Member
Both the order of birth and the interval between births can be included since they are not collinear variables. Nevertheless, the first births will be excluded because, as you mentioned, the birth interval is not applicable for bord=1.
geometry dash breeze

[Updated on: Tue, 13 August 2024 23:29]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic: Childhood immunization
Next Topic: Under-5 Stunting variable for Household Level
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Tue Nov 26 18:51:25 Coordinated Universal Time 2024