The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Countries » India » Antenatal care (Mismatch in weighted figures from data and state wise report (Jammu and Kashmir))
Antenatal care [message #28685] Fri, 23 February 2024 00:23 Go to previous message
Abid Monga is currently offline  Abid Monga
Messages: 2
Registered: February 2024
Member
Hi,
I am trying to compute "among women with a live birth in the 5 years preceding the survey, percentage who received different types of antenatal care (ANC) during the pregnancy for their most recent live birth, by background characteristics, Jammu and Kashmir, 2019-20" using NFHS 5 data. For that, at the first instance, I have to compute the number of women covered under survey with recent birth. However, while calculating the same using SPSS there is inconsistency in data results and reports results in weighted figures. As the state report for Jammu and kashmir shows the number of women with recent births to be 4812 (weighted) and the figure computed from the data is 1379. There is no in-consistency in unweighted data.
The code used in SPSS is reproduced below. The results generated are also attached.
Where I am going wrong. Please help.

GET
FILE='D:\NFHS\Data\Individual Recode\IAIR7DFL.SAV'.
DATASET NAME DataSet1 WINDOW=FRONT.
USE ALL.
COMPUTE filter_$=(V024 = 1 & MIDX$1 = 1).
VARIABLE LABELS filter_$ 'V024 = 1 & MIDX$1 = 1 (FILTER)'.
VALUE LABELS filter_$ 0 'Not Selected' 1 'Selected'.
FORMATS filter_$ (f1.0).
FILTER BY filter_$.
EXECUTE.
COMPUTE WGT_LASR=V005 / 1000000.
EXECUTE.
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=V013
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

[Updated on: Fri, 23 February 2024 00:32]

Report message to a moderator

 
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Poverty line and tribes
Next Topic: Merging NFHS 3 and NFHS 4 (India)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Thu Sep 5 01:23:13 Coordinated Universal Time 2024