The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Countries » India » Caste in NFHS-1
Caste in NFHS-1 [message #27902] Thu, 19 October 2023 20:38 Go to next message
Abid_F is currently offline  Abid_F
Messages: 5
Registered: October 2023
Member
Can someone help me categorise v131 (ethnicity) into the categories SC, ST, OBC and General for the NFHS-1 datasets since this dataset does not have separate categories for OBC and General?
Re: Caste in NFHS-1 [message #27903 is a reply to message #27902] Fri, 20 October 2023 10:02 Go to previous messageGo to next message
fred.arnold@icf.com is currently offline  fred.arnold@icf.com
Messages: 84
Registered: May 2021
Senior Member
The "other" category for castes/tribes in NFHS-1 includes everyone who is not a member of a scheduled caste or a scheduled tribe. This is the case for household heads, female respondents, and male respondents. The "other" category is not broken down into "OBCs" and "others" in the questionnaires for households, women, and men. There is also a category response category for "No caste." It is not possible to break out "Other backward classes" separately. Note that none of the tables in the NFHS-1 final report have a separate category for OBCs (see Tables 3.6, 3.7, 3.14, and 3.17. The text in Chapter 3 also does not make any reference to OBCs.
Re: Caste in NFHS-1 [message #27911 is a reply to message #27903] Fri, 20 October 2023 20:46 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Abid_F is currently offline  Abid_F
Messages: 5
Registered: October 2023
Member
Thank you for your reply. Actually, I am analysing data from NFHS-1 to NFHS-5, and since after NFHS-1, every NFHS survey has separate general and OBC categories, how can I append the files to do an accurate analysis?
Re: Caste in NFHS-1 [message #27943 is a reply to message #27911] Tue, 24 October 2023 12:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Bridgette-DHS is currently offline  Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3199
Registered: February 2013
Senior Member
Following is a response from Senior DHS staff members, Tom Pullum and Fred Arnold:

We generally do not encourage data users to use the individual caste/tribe names because it would typically take several months to determine what caste/tribe names from the NFHS surveys correspond with the actual caste/tribe names. For example, there are many different spellings of specific caste/tribe names. Accurate measurement of castes in India is not as easy as it would seem. There are more than 1,000 castes and sub-castes in India. In NFHS, we do not provide a list of the castes/tribes to interviewers because they would usually not be able to find a caste on the list even if it was on the list somewhere, especially given multiple different spellings of each caste/tribe and the fact that the NFHs surveys are administered in 20 different languages. It is also difficult to given interviewers a rule for what constitutes a caste since there is no clear definition. For example, Nepali is a caste, but Bengali is not. The caste/tribe (SPECIFY) names in NFHS are not part of the standard datasets.

The 5 NFHSs have included two variables (except just 1 in the first NFHS) that give rough classifications of the castes/tribes. They have different variable names and different value labels in the different surveys. If you want to combine them, you will have to develop new variables as recodes of those nine variables. The Stata lines pasted below will give you the value labels for these variables, which will help you to construct the variables you want.

It may actually not be helpful to append the files. In all countries with DHS surveys, MANY variables have changed category definitions from one survey to the next. The value label in the last survey appended will over-write all the previous value labels. You may not even realize that the codes have changed or the labels have changed. You need to be very careful when pooling surveys.

* Specify a workspace
cd e:\DHS\DHS_data\scratch

use "C:\Users\26216\ICF\Analysis - Shared Resources\Data\DHSdata\IAPR23FL.DTA", clear 
keep if hv101==1
keep hv001 hv002 shcaste
gen NFHS=1
save temp_1.dta, replace

use "C:\Users\26216\ICF\Analysis - Shared Resources\Data\DHSdata\IAPR42FL.DTA", clear 
keep if hv101==1
keep hv001 hv002 sh40 sh41
gen NFHS=2
save temp_2.dta, replace

use "C:\Users\26216\ICF\Analysis - Shared Resources\Data\DHSdata\IAPR52FL.DTA", clear 
keep if hv101==1
keep hv001 hv002 sh45 sh46 
gen NFHS=3
save temp_3.dta, replace

use "C:\Users\26216\ICF\Analysis - Shared Resources\Data\DHSdata\IAPR74FL.DTA", clear 
keep if hv101==1
keep hv001 hv002 sh35 sh36 
gen NFHS=4
save temp_4.dta, replace

use "C:\Users\26216\ICF\Analysis - Shared Resources\Data\DHSdata\IAPR7EFL.DTA", clear 
keep if hv101==1
keep hv001 hv002 sh48 sh49 
gen NFHS=5
save temp_5.dta, replace

use temp_1.dta, clear
append using temp_2.dta
append using temp_3.dta
append using temp_4.dta
append using temp_5.dta
label list

*Then construct unifying recodes for the different variables related to caste in the different surveys

Re: Caste in NFHS-1 [message #27945 is a reply to message #27943] Tue, 24 October 2023 13:18 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Abid_F is currently offline  Abid_F
Messages: 5
Registered: October 2023
Member
Thank you for your response. I'd like to clarify that I'm not looking to examine individual castes; instead, I aim to categorize castes into broader groups: SC, ST, OBC, and Other or General. All NFHS datasets, except for NFHS-1, include this caste categorization. However, since I'm pooling the data from NFHS-1 to NFHS-5, I need to establish similar categorizations in NFHS-1 as well. Could you please confirm whether it's possible to categorize castes in NFHS-1 into the four categories I mentioned?
Re: Caste in NFHS-1 [message #27953 is a reply to message #27945] Wed, 25 October 2023 12:39 Go to previous message
Bridgette-DHS is currently offline  Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3199
Registered: February 2013
Senior Member

Following is a response from Senior DHS staff member, Tom Pullum:

We have nothing to add to the earlier responses. There is not enough information in the NFHS-1 data to construct a separate OBC category.
Previous Topic: Comparing national-regional and state
Next Topic: Nightlights_Composite
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Nov 27 13:20:39 Coordinated Universal Time 2024