The DHS Program User Forum: Weighting data » Number of obs and population size not the same

Home » Data » Weighting data » Number of obs and population size not the same

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Number of obs and population size not the same [message #26782]

Mon, 01 May 2023 08:00

Johanne Elgaard
Messages: 6
Registered: April 2023

Member

I'm working with the 2014 Ghana DHS. I am trying to calculate frequencies and percentages after weighting the data. My problem is that my number of observations are 945, but when using both svyset and [iweight] I get a population size of 925 and a number of obs of 945 in the output. When calculating the sum of the weighted frequencies together, it also adds up to 925. Can anyone explain the difference between number of obs and population size to me?

Thank you:)

Report message to a moderator

Re: Number of obs and population size not the same [message #26784 is a reply to message #26782]

Mon, 01 May 2023 08:44

Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3210
Registered: February 2013

Senior Member

Following is a response from Senior DHS staff member, Tom Pullum:

I believe you are just seeing the difference between the weighted and unweighted numbers of cases. In the IR file, v005 is scaled or normalized so that the mean value of v005/1000000 is 1. However, for subpopulations, or in the KR file, where v005 is attached to the woman's children, the mean weights don't necessarily retain this property. That's why the weighted and unweighted totals differ. If you think this is not the explanation, please let us know.

Report message to a moderator

Re: Number of obs and population size not the same [message #26785 is a reply to message #26784]

Mon, 01 May 2023 09:10

Johanne Elgaard
Messages: 6
Registered: April 2023

Member

Thank you for your response :) That could be the explanation since I'm using the KR file. Should I then just weight the data when during my logistic regression but not interpret specifically on the frequencies since the weighted and unweighted numbers do not correspond here?

Report message to a moderator

Re: Number of obs and population size not the same [message #26786 is a reply to message #26785]

Mon, 01 May 2023 12:45

Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3210
Registered: February 2013

Senior Member

Following is a response from Senior DHS staff member, Tom Pullum:

You should not have to do any re-weighting. If you are using Stata, with svyset and [pweight=v005], Stata will always re-normalize so the weights have a mean of 1. As part of this, the factor of 1,000,000 is removed. (That's why you get the same results with [pweight=v005] or with [pweight=v005/1000000]. I don't know about packages other than Stata.

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	All-women factor in trend analysis
Next Topic:	Household weighted prevalence estimates

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Dec 13 15:33:06 Coordinated Universal Time 2024