The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Topics » Mortality » Discrete Time Vs Continous Time Survival Model
Re: Discrete Time Vs Continous Time Survival Model [message #21610 is a reply to message #21607] Wed, 25 November 2020 07:57 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Bridgette-DHS is currently offline  Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3230
Registered: February 2013
Senior Member

Following is a response from DHS Research & Data Analysis Director, Tom Pullum:

DHS staff cannot provide answers to such specific questions about statistical methods or estimation procedures in Stata. If you want to continue with this method, I hope other users will be able to help.

Note that neonatal deaths occur at age 0 months, a very compressed range. Timing within that first month after the birth is captured very well by the distinction between early neonatal (completed days 0-6, or b6 in the range 100 to 106) and late neonatal. Also for neonatal deaths you have virtually no censoring. The only censored cases will be births in the month (or 28 days) prior to the day of interview and you can just drop them. Also I don't think the assumption of proportional hazards (within the first month) that is built into Cox regression is appropriate or necessary. I would just use logit regression.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Probability of dying between exact age 15 and 50 (35q15)
Next Topic: survival analysis of neonatal mortality
Goto Forum:
  

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Thu Sep 4 18:14:16 Coordinated Universal Time 2025
.:: Contact :: Home :: Privacy Policy ::.

Powered by: FUDforum 3.0.9.
Copyright ©2001-2018 FUDforum Bulletin Board Software