The DHS Program User Forum: Fertility » TFR using tfr2 using NFHS-1 (1992-93)

Home » Topics » Fertility » TFR using tfr2 using NFHS-1 (1992-93)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

TFR using tfr2 using NFHS-1 (1992-93) [message #19153]

Thu, 30 April 2020 03:46

Santosh88
Messages: 9
Registered: November 2019

Member

I am trying to estimate the TFR using NFHS-1 (1992-93 data of India using tfr2 command in STATA.

I am getting the total TFR which is matching with the National report of NFHS-1, but when I am trying to estimate the TFR for Urban and Rural, the estimates are not matching with the report.

According to NFHS-1 report
TFR (Total)=3.39
TFR (Urban)= 2.70
TFR (Rural)=3.67

But according to my analysis, using the syntax

by v025, sort: tfr2 , awf( awfactt)
the estimate are diffrent

TFR (urban)= 3.09
TFR(Rural) =3.52

Please help me to estimate the correct TFR for Urban and Rural NFHS-1 data.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		TFR using tfr2 using NFHS-1 (1992-93) By: Santosh88 on Thu, 30 April 2020 03:46
		Re: TFR using tfr2 using NFHS-1 (1992-93) By: schoumaker on Thu, 30 April 2020 03:56
		Re: TFR using tfr2 using NFHS-1 (1992-93) By: Santosh88 on Thu, 30 April 2020 04:14
		Re: TFR using tfr2 using NFHS-1 (1992-93) By: schoumaker on Sun, 10 May 2020 03:23
		Re: TFR using tfr2 using NFHS-1 (1992-93) By: Santosh88 on Sun, 10 May 2020 11:46

Previous Topic:	reverse order of birth
Next Topic:	Mean age at childbearing

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Dec 26 20:00:02 Coordinated Universal Time 2024