The DHS Program User Forum: Merging data files » Are the merging commands and results correct

Home » Data » Merging data files » Are the merging commands and results correct (Verifying the correctness of IR and PR Files merging command)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Are the merging commands and results correct [message #18947 is a reply to message #18794]

Tue, 24 March 2020 14:18

Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3230
Registered: February 2013

Senior Member

Following is a response from DHS Research & Data Analysis Director, Tom Pullum:

I recommend that when you change the names of the matching variables, you consistently use EITHER the PR variable names OR the IR variable names. For example, rename hv001 v001; rename hv002 v002; rename hvidx v003. Then sort both files on v001 v002 v003. The way you did it will work but it's not as systematic.

I think the merge has worked ok. My rule of thumb is that about a quarter of the people in the PR file will be women age 15-49. That is, the cases with _merge=1 will be about 3 times as large as the cases with _merge=3. If that's what you got, you are ok.

You could consider reducing the PR file to women age 15-49, right after the "use ...PR...". This will give you both the de fact and de jure residents.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Are the merging commands and results correct By: okunloladavid on Sat, 22 February 2020 16:19
		Re: Are the merging commands and results correct By: Bridgette-DHS on Tue, 24 March 2020 14:18
		Re: Are the merging commands and results correct By: okunloladavid on Thu, 08 April 2021 17:22

Previous Topic:	INDIA - NFHS-4 - PR AND CR
Next Topic:	Merging variables from original DHS with IPUMS DHS

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 16 16:15:59 Coordinated Universal Time 2025