The DHS Program User Forum: Nutrition and Anthropometry » Nutritional Status of Women on SPSS and Stata

Home » Topics » Nutrition and Anthropometry » Nutritional Status of Women on SPSS and Stata

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Nutritional Status of Women on SPSS and Stata [message #15174 is a reply to message #15115]

Wed, 13 June 2018 03:30

Mayank_Ag
Messages: 22
Registered: May 2018
Location: Hyderabad

Member

I did a merge of KR (v001 v002 b16) and PR (hv001, hv002, hvidx) with PR as my base. I am working with DHS 15-16 for India.

I found that obs in HA40 and V445 are not matching which is not right according to other posts in the forums. I did a little digging so as to why they are not matching. All the variables containing the child and household characteristics (HW70 with HC70; HW71 with HC71 etc.) are matching. But the variables containing mother's characteristics are not matching. Further it looks like as if they have got shifted by one place. I have no idea how is that happening. After this i checked the merged file with my base files. It looks as if the problem is with the base PR file itself.

I have attached an image that can tell the whole problem. I have selected 3 variables to demonstrate the issue. But the trend is all over.

I used this same file(merged) to generate all the estimates as presented in the final table 10.1. I got them all matching except the ones that involve mother's characteristics (schooling, interview and BMI).

Attachment: issue.JPG
(Size: 88.81KB, Downloaded 473 times)

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Nutritional Status of Women on SPSS and Stata By: Mlue on Tue, 05 June 2018 09:04
		Re: Nutritional Status of Women on SPSS and Stata By: Mayank_Ag on Wed, 13 June 2018 03:30

Previous Topic:	Mother's Nutritional Status.
Next Topic:	Mother's Nutritional Status.

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Jan 11 04:20:52 Coordinated Universal Time 2025