urban/rural variable with education data in dhs in stata [message #13303] |
Mon, 16 October 2017 08:19 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a9cc/5a9cc74ce7b10c80f3fd36de2835cf2448cb6dd2" alt="Go to next message Go to next message" |
jrg20
Messages: 4 Registered: October 2017 Location: South Africa
|
Member |
|
|
Hello,
I am using the PR File of DHS 2010 Malawi. and want to first attempt to replicate Table 2.4 (net attendance ratio) before progressing to do the analysis I am actually looking to do just to ensure I am doing the right thing. I was wondering if you could help me with the urban/rural variable you used to do that? Unless i have not searched correctly, I am unable to find it in the PR file. And when I do find it in another file such as the MR file, i am not sure if that is the correct one to use as to my understanding that would just represent all eligible men and not a fuller sample like i have with the PR file.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Re: urban/rural variable with education data in dhs in stata [message #13305 is a reply to message #13304] |
Mon, 16 October 2017 09:38 data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39ac1/39ac125008c2564b298c692e1f4463ac6b26c5f8" alt="Go to previous message Go to previous message" |
jrg20
Messages: 4 Registered: October 2017 Location: South Africa
|
Member |
|
|
Thank you so much for your prompt response. I found it, but have been unable to replicate the results found in the table in the DHS still. Find my (stata) code below:
gen weight=hv005/1000000
svyset [pw=weight], psu(hv021) strata(hv022)
svy:tab hv122 if inrange(hv105,6,13) & hv025==1 & hv104==1 & hv103==1 /// range given in the notes in DHS Final report Table 2.4 where hv103==1 is defacto, hv025==1 is urban, and hv104==1 is male.
output is giving me attended ==92.76% instead of 96.3 as given in the DHS Report.
May you kindly tell me where I am getting this wrong?
Thank you.
|
|
|