Weighting Data for Pooled BDHS Household Members Dataset [message #12156] |
Mon, 03 April 2017 13:35 |
suzzon
Messages: 18 Registered: July 2013 Location: Bangladesh
|
Member |
|
|
Dear DHS experts,
I am using the Bangladesh DHS 1993/94, 1996/97, 1999/2000, 2004, 2007, 2011 and 2014 Household members files. Using DHS forum guidance, I have de-normalized the weights (hv005). Then I have appended all the BDHS Household members files. I am using comparative wealth index (CWI) proposed by Dr. Shea Rutstein and Sarah Staveteig as socioeconomic status variable. I have the following specific questions:
1. Should I use the de-normalized hv005 (denormw) as sample weight in further statistical analysis?
2. Or Should I compute a new household members weight variable (hhmemwt) from the de-normalized hv005 and use it as sample weight in further statistical analysis? The procedure of this Household members weighting (hhmemwt) for CWI has been mentioned in CWI computation procedures (SPSS syntax).
I am providing the Stata code for calculation of these two weight variables (i.e. denormw and hhmemwt) here:
**** Denormalization of household members weight provied in household member files
gen denormw=(hv005/1000000)*(total number of residential households in the country/ total number of households interviewed in the survey)
*** HH members weighting for Index
gen hhmemwt=denormw*hv012
Thank you for your time.
Moin
[Updated on: Mon, 03 April 2017 13:36] Report message to a moderator
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Weighting Data for Pooled BDHS Household Members Dataset [message #13733 is a reply to message #13723] |
Thu, 14 December 2017 09:44 |
Bridgette-DHS
Messages: 3208 Registered: February 2013
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Following is a response from Senior DHS Stata Specialist, Tom Pullum:
The household members file, or PR file, has one record per person, You could multiply the weights in that file (hv005) by the total population of the country (preferably the total population residing in household), divided by the total sample size (which is the same whether weighted or unweighted). The problem you describe would only be relevant if you were using the HR file, which has one record per household.
There are many components of uncertainty when you do this, regarding the restriction to the population in households, the choice of reference date, the fact that some population estimates will be inter-censal estimates and others will be post-censal projections, the inaccuracies in the census counts, the possibility of using information about age/sex and place of residence within the country, etc. I personally would not alter the weights in this way. There have been many postings on this topic.
|
|
|
Re: Weighting Data for Pooled BDHS Household Members Dataset [message #13734 is a reply to message #13733] |
Thu, 14 December 2017 09:55 |
habt_lancs
Messages: 21 Registered: July 2017 Location: Lancaster, UK
|
Member |
|
|
Thanks so much. Very helpful.
One point though
You said :"I personally would not alter the weights in this way."
I also read your suggestions in a different thread; you seem to be unconvinced of this way of de-normalizing (re-weighting).
Since i am using many surveys of a country (Ghana) pooling together, what do you think is the best way to solve this problem.
De-normalizing this way or just simply using the pooled original weight (either hv005 or v005) by dividing it by 1000000?
To elaborate on what i am doing, if it helps, i am using a diff-in-diff estimation strategy where my interest variable is measured at region level and i cluster SE at region level.
best,
|
|
|