The DHS Program User Forum: Reproductive Health

Home » Topics » Reproductive Health » Reproductive Coercion

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator

Re: Reproductive Coercion [message #12115 is a reply to message #12087]

Wed, 29 March 2017 05:00

ebemio1@gmail.com
Messages: 3
Registered: November 2016
Location: Nigeria

Member

Good Morning Liz,
I am working on the prevalence and correlates of Reproductive coercion in Nigeria using the NDHS 2013. Reproductive coercion is deﬁned as behaviors intended to maintain power and control in a relationship such that interferes with contraception use and pregnancy. It is encompasses pregnancy coercion, contraceptive sabotage and control of pregnancy outcomes.
In my preliminary assessment, using a secondary dataset already limits my choice of definition since i cant influence the questions. Since reproductive coercion includes;
1. All women who intend to have more children but partner hinders their decision by enforcing contraception.
2. All women who do not desire more children but partner influences fertility decision by opposing contraception.
3. All women who do not desire more children and cannot negotiate condom with partner especially if she is not on any contraceptive
4. Partner willfully sabotaging contraceptive use.
5. Partner in any way physically or emotionally influences pregnancy outcome either by forcing the continuation or termination of a pregnancy.
Unfortunately not many studies have tried estimating prevalence of reproductive coercion using a Secondary dataset. My estimate intends to use all women currently living with partner or in union with partner as study population, while the target population will include two categories of women calculated as experiencing reproductive coercion as (1.)women whose fertility preferences is not wanting more children (V602=3), not currently on any form of contraceptive (V312=0) and whose reason for not using contraceptive is that partner/husband opposes (V3A08J) as well as (2.) women who do not desire more children, not on any method as well as not being able to negotiate condom (V850B=0).
Unfortunately this greatly under estimates reproductive coercion, but in this context am i right in my NDHS definition? if no, what will best capture it and are there other possible definitions derivable from the NDHS using the above numbered criterias? I will be grateful for your assistance.

ebe

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Reproductive Coercion By: ebemio1@gmail.com on Mon, 13 March 2017 04:31
		Re: Reproductive Coercion By: Liz-DHS on Tue, 28 March 2017 12:36
		Re: Reproductive Coercion By: ebemio1@gmail.com on Wed, 29 March 2017 05:00
		Re: Reproductive Coercion By: Liz-DHS on Thu, 06 April 2017 16:46
		Re: Reproductive Coercion By: ebemio1@gmail.com on Thu, 06 April 2017 17:28

Previous Topic:	SKILLED BIRTH ATTENDANTS ON SAS - PAKISTAN DHS 2012-13
Next Topic:	Fatalism as a reason for non use of contraception

Goto Forum:

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Jan 17 05:48:57 Coordinated Universal Time 2026