The DHS Program User Forum
Discussions regarding The DHS Program data and results
Home » Countries » India » India NFHS-3 - slum coding
Re: India NFHS-3 - slum coding [message #11875 is a reply to message #11870] Thu, 23 February 2017 04:14 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
soniwe is currently offline  soniwe
Messages: 7
Registered: October 2016
Location: Auckland
Member
Hi again,

I have realised why I was having those counter-intuitive results. I had recoded the missing values and included them as "non-slum". The majority of these were from rural populations, which have much lower coverage of health interventions even than urban slums, and this was skewing the results. I now want to recode into three categories: "Urban non-slum" "Urban slum" "Rural". Is it ok to re-code the missing as "Urban non-slum" if v025 is 1 (urban) and as "Rural" if v025 is 2 (rural) (see code below)? Are those participants categorised as "non slum" in the variable sslumc equivalent to other urban dwellers categorised as 1 in v025 - i.e. does it make sense to combine these two groups?

Sonia


recode sslumc (.=2) if v025==1
recode sslumc (.=3) if v025==2
label define slum 1 "Urban slum" 2 "Urban non slum" 3 "Rural"
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Regarding the new DHS dataset
Next Topic: Maratha & Mahar caste codes (NFHS 1, 1992-93, India)
Goto Forum:
  


Current Time: Wed Jul 31 04:24:37 Coordinated Universal Time 2024