India NFHS-3 - slum coding [message #11870] |
Wed, 22 February 2017 10:24 |
soniwe
Messages: 7 Registered: October 2016 Location: Auckland
|
Member |
|
|
Hi there,
I am using the NFHS-3 dataset to calculate equity of coverage of vaccination and other maternal and child health interventions. One of the variables we are using to stratify by is sslumc (slum designation by census). According to the map file and the variable categories in the dataset, 1 is coded as "slum" and 2 as "non slum". When I do cross-tabs of these (after svyset) by variables such as vaccination and skilled birth attendance, coverage seems to be much higher in the "slum" group. This is counter-intuitive, and I wonder whether there may be a mistake in the variable coding here?
Thanks,
Sonia
|
|
|
|
Re: India NFHS-3 - slum coding [message #11878 is a reply to message #11875] |
Thu, 23 February 2017 10:35 |
fredarnold
Messages: 45 Registered: March 2014
|
Member |
|
|
In NFHS-3, information on whether or not enumeration areas are in slums or non-slums is only available for eight cities (Mumbai, Delhi, Kolkata, Hyderabad, Chennai, Indore, Meerut, and Nagpur). For those eight cities you could identify slums, non-slums, and rural households, but you can't do that for the whole country.
|
|
|